By ThinkGoat

Lancaster, Wisconsin Originally I glanced at this article, bookmarked the page, and decided to let it ferment in my brain a couple of days to see where I’d go with it. I mean, it’s not everyday one gets a story like this dropped in their lap. Upon first appearance, it seemed to have everything that makes me excited about covering a story…fuck-up looking perpetrators, extreme stupidity, and one of the few bizarre-type crimes that’ll really make one stop and say, “what in the hell?”, “Jesus Christ”, “LMFAO”, or a beautiful mix of the three. This story can also be viewed as a tale of brotherly love and loyal friendship. But after digging a little further and discussing this case with another staff member, this bizarre crime quickly became overshadowed by a big example of how the laws can change in the blink of an eye and one can be held accountable for charges that were dropped years earlier. I really hate when a fantastic case of attempted necrophilia is spoiled by legal shit. Especially a case as beautiful as this.

In 2006, these three rather handsome dudes devised a grand plan to assist brother and awesome friend Nicholas Grunke with his longtime fantasy of fucking a dead chick. For real. The longtime dream came to an pseudo-urgent head when Nick had seen a picture in the local obituaries featuring a young woman who’d been killed in a motorcycle crash. What’s better, huh? She’d been dead only a short amount of time so the flesh she had left after the wreck would relatively be in place, right? Besides, what are the chances her “goods” would be all torn up? And I know that was probably considered because it seems as though Nick had thought some things through, like what to take with them, but failed to be completely prepared for the obstacles they’d face once they started executing their plan…

Like getting through the concrete vault and casket. They did allegedly have a tire iron in the vehicle with them, and obviously had shovels because when police investigated, they found the rather large hole in the ground that exposed the vault. They did adhere to what was taught to them in school about having safe sex – they stopped off at the local Walmart ahead of time and purchased a box of condoms. They had a gray tarp that they planned on wrapping around the corpse. They even had a beautiful wooded area behind Nick’s house where he planned on wooing this dead body. But they failed to think about the effort it’d take to break through the barriers that separated them from the once-in-a-lifetime (hopefully) experience.

Nick seemed to think he preferred the dead type so he’d not have to listen to any nagging. Obviously he’d experienced some issues previously, more than likely being a failure at achieving some form of orgasm via self-manipulation and knew any living/breathing girl would never keep quiet about having experienced a wasted fuck. For sure.

Alexander Grunke and Dustin Radke teamed up with Grunke’s twin Nickolas (all 20-years-old at the time) and proceeded to St. Charles Catholic Cemetery in Cassville, Wisconsin to dig up Laura Tennessen. Since Laura was also 20 when she was killed, I wonder if she was picked because Nick wanted to finally be able to say he’d screwed a girl his own age and not have to lie about it? Anyway, this terrific trio got a little spooked when a vehicle approached and they fled the scene in their vehicle. The police were notified by a report of suspicious behavior and it didn’t take long for them to track down a car with three individuals acting strangely and sweating profusely. With a couple quick confessions and a vehicle full of evidence, the idiots were arrested on attempted sexual assault, attempted theft, and attempted damage to cemetery property. Interestingly, Wisconsin did not have a law on the books regarding necrophilia. One would think that’s a no-brainer. Then again, there are states that do not have bestiality laws. I suppose they just think everyone knows that normal people don’t go around screwing dead things and animal-type things. Then again, lawmakers haven’t read crime sites such as this regularly either.

In an archived article dated 9/20/2006, Judge George Curry dismissed the attempted sexual assault charges against the three and stated there was enough evidence to proceed with the other charges. They were later convicted of the attempted theft and attempted damage to property charges. So how is it that Wisconsin could, after charges were dropped, come back and recharge the three with a crime that was clearly not on the books when the crime took place? Even after a court of appeals agreed with the decision there was no law that could apply to the attempted necrophilia?

Laura Tennessen

As one can imagine, people went nuts and pressure was applied to redefine or rewrite a law that wasn’t so murky. And it was done so in July of 2008. Two years after charges had been dropped. The law is named after Laura Tennessen, the victim that was the object of Nick’s desires. And I guess you can’t very well memorialize someone by naming a law after them if there were no formal ties binding an actual incident and her now, can you?

This is how the “system” is getting away with what I personally consider double-jeopardy.

The outrage sparked the Wisconsin Supreme court to make a case State of Wisconsin v. Grunke. In a 5-2 vote, the state ruled to uphold the original charges of attempted sexual assault against the three idiots.

“[w]hoever has sexual intercourse with a person without the consent of that person is guilty of a felony.” In this case, the woman in question did not “consent” to any sexual acts therefore the law against sexual assault applies here. The court wrote, “The State must still prove the element ‘without consent’ beyond a reasonable doubt; that endeavor is subject to a simple proof when the victim is a corpse.”

No shit. However, this was not the way the law was originally interpreted when these three committed the crime. The law was known by the prosecution and the judge who heard the case. Even the court of appeals. The charges were dropped. As fucked-up as the situation was, as much justice as I’d like to see administered to Laura’s family, it’s extremely dangerous territory for our judges to start re-interpreting laws in order to recharge criminals, isn’t it? Shouldn’t it have actually worked like this:  these three get a “you were fucking lucky” associated with their names and the “system” acknowledges its bloodied eye, apologizes to the citizens of the state, and vow to never let this sort of thing slip through the cracks again due to their negligence to make revisions needed due to the increasingly sick-fucking-idiots out here? To weasel around and find some fuck-up way to justify double-jeopardy is as fucked-up as the Grunke boy’s fantasy was.

Nicholas Grunke, Dustin Radke, and now Alexander Grunke have all been found guilty of third-degree sexual assault. Nicholas has already been sentenced to two years in prison, three years of extended supervision, and placed on the sex offender registry for at least five years. Alexander’s fate has yet to be determined.

Source1 | Source2 | Source3 | Source4 |

Advertisements
Comments
  1. ravenblackehart says:

    Would you technically consider a dead body a person?

    Like

  2. thinkgoat says:

    Not necessarily. I think this opens a whole can of worms. 😛

    Like

  3. Lazlo says:

    Another thing that comes to my mind is that these intrepid tomb raiders never actually performed any sexual acts. How can you charge them with sexual assault, when the extent of their actions was to move a little dirt? So they had an “idea”. They went on a raiding party and lost their nerve. They committed no assault of anything in my humble opinion. A classic case of justice driven by public opinion, even before the laws were made into pretzels to achieve a predetermined end.

    Like

  4. deadmyron says:

    I once read an article about a woman who came to the hospital for treatment. Her dog attacked her and bit her nose off. She told the attending physician that the dog became angry when she tried to fellate him while she was eating his food.

    My point: Nobody would have ever been the wiser if she’d just kept her mouth shut. What? The dog was going to tell?

    These three jack-offs could have saved a few charges by just shutting the fuck up. Hell, I would have told them it was some sort of satanic ritual before I told them what I was really doing.

    In retrospect, though, at least we know how truly fucked up these three are.

    Like

  5. ravenblackehart says:

    @Deadmyron—wait, SHE was eating the dog’s food or the DOG was eating the dog’s food? I’m confused.

    Anyway, I thought everyone was aware of the
    caveat to never bother or try to interact with an animal while they are eating.

    Like

  6. interesting says:

    “[w]hoever has sexual intercourse with a person without the consent of that person is guilty of a felony.

    Ok, so I guess what the state of Wisconsin is saying is that if you are into bangin’ dead chicks that you have to hold a seance to get her approval.

    Guess the next time these guys attempt to get a piece of ass, they better take a Ouija board in addition to the shovel and condoms.

    Like

  7. deadmyron says:

    @RaVen…Whoops! I fucked up. Now I have an image of a noseless woman with a mouthful of Alpo and doggie dick.

    The dog was eating the food. I should proofread.

    Like

  8. shelly says:

    I want to know why they wasted the money on condoms, its not like she was gonna get pregnant!

    Like

  9. Ajt says:

    You didn’t read the supreme court’s opinion. Part of the existing law at the time clearly stated that it was illegal to have sex with a dead person and in fact that law had been passed years earlier when a guy killed a woman and then raped her corpse. He claimed that the statute didn’t address raping her after he murdered her. The court said it did and the legislature passed the law that the Grunkes later tried to get around, claiming the law was ambiguous. To make it sure the next time, the new law was adopted absolutely stating that sex with a corpse was illegal. They would’ve been better off claiming they were mentally ill.

    Like

  10. thinkgoat says:

    Thanks, Ajt!

    Like

  11. At least they are aware of infection. lol.

    Liked by 1 person

Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s